Schema.ai· vLLM
vLLM official site Log in

Use Cases

Use caseWhat it targetsMetricsWhat Schema establishesvLLM
#12077: Active KV use is not reusable cache residencyThe usage gauge measures active/referenced capacity, while released blocks may remain reusable until eviction.3Semantics resolve the interpretation; actual reuse requires same-window hit/query observations.v0.23.0
#35048: Aggregate throughput can hide experience regressionsToken and iteration metrics describe system work; TTFT queue ITL TPOT and E2E describe distinct parts of per-request experience.8Schema supplies the decomposition; root cause requires controlled A/B or commit bisect.v0.23.0
#38194: Prefix-cache percentages require comparable definitionsA percentage hides its numerator, denominator, labels, process scope, routing, reset history, tokenization, and time window.2Schema defines the vLLM side; the other system and matched runtime data are required for comparison.v0.23.0
#40696: Full-block eligibility creates prefix-cache cliffsFull-block matching can create sharp eligibility boundaries; zero hits need not mean the counter is broken.4Semantics explain the mechanism; model geometry and net impact require version-matched measurement.v0.23.0
#8115: TTFT observations and completed requests count different eventsTTFT is observed on first-token production; request_success increments from finished requests, so lifecycle and failure paths can separate them.2Schema proves different update events; a particular delta needs deployment observations.v0.23.0
#9346: vLLM metrics do not provide an all-HTTP-request denominatorrequest_success counts finished engine requests; running requests is a gauge; neither counts every HTTP attempt.2Lifecycle semantics rule out proposed denominators; complete SLI needs external API-layer telemetry.v0.23.0